Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 113
Filter
1.
Acta ortop. bras ; 32(1): e266853, 2024. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1549995

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of drainage tube placement on postoperative pain, recovery, and opioid consumption within a 72-hour period following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Methods: Patients with medial knee osteoarthritis who underwent UKA from January 2019 to August 2020 were enrolled in the study and divided into two groups based on whether they received a drain postoperatively. Results: The drainage group had significantly lower VAS scores on day 1, day 2, and day 3, in addition to significantly smaller changes in the circumference of the knee joint within 3 days postoperatively (P <0.05). The ROM in the drainage group significantly increased at 3 days and 1 month post-surgery, with a statistically significant difference in morphine consumption between the two groups at 3 days (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (5 cases) and wound bleeding (1 case) was lower in the drainage group compared to the non-drainage group (P<0.05). Conclusions: The placement of a drainage tube in UKA may reduce the swelling of knee joint and pain, which not only reduces the use of Opioid but also facilitates early functional activities of the knee joint. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Comparative Study.


RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o impacto da implantação do tubo de drenagem na dor pós-operatória, na recuperação e no consumo de opioides em um período de 72 horas após a artroplastia unicompartimental do joelho (UKA). Métodos: Pacientes com osteoartrite medial do joelho submetidos à UKA de janeiro de 2019 a agosto de 2020 foram incluídos no estudo e divididos em dois grupos com base no fato de terem ou não recebido um dreno no pós-operatório. Resultados: O grupo de drenagem apresentou escores EVA significativamente menores no dia 1, no dia 2 e no dia 3, além de alterações significativamente menores na circunferência da articulação do joelho em 3 dias de pós-operatório (P <0,05). A ADM no grupo de drenagem aumentou significativamente em 3 dias e 1 mês após a cirurgia, com uma diferença estatisticamente significativa no consumo de morfina entre os dois grupos em 3 dias (P<0,05). A incidência de náuseas e vômitos no pós-operatório(5 casos) e sangramento da ferida (1 caso) foi menor no grupo de drenagem em comparação com o grupo sem drenagem (P<0,05). Conclusão: A utilização de tubo de drenagem na UKA pode reduzir o edema articular do joelho e a dor, reduzindo o uso de opioides e facilitando as atividades funcionais iniciais da articulação do joelho. Nível de Evidência III; Estudo Comparativo Retrospectivo.

2.
Rev. mex. anestesiol ; 46(4): 237-241, oct.-dic. 2023. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1536635

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Introducción: el dolor agudo postoperatorio demora la recuperación funcional del paciente. Objetivo: evaluar utilidad de la ketamina asociada a morfina administrados en bolos intravenosos en el control del dolor agudo postoperatorio de pacientes sometidos a cirugía renal electiva. Material y métodos: realizamos estudio doble ciego en pacientes con dolor postoperatorio moderado-severo sometidos a cirugía renal electiva. Se conformaron dos grupos: grupo MK administramos morfina 0.05 mg/kg más ketamina 0.2 mg/kg y grupo M morfina 0.05 mg/kg más solución salina a 0.9%. Pacientes con dolor de intensidad moderada-severa según escala analógica visual recibieron dosis de morfina cada 20 minutos hasta lograr dolor ligero, registrándose el consumo total de morfina por paciente. La tensión arterial, frecuencia cardíaca y respiratoria, saturación de oxígeno y efectos adversos fueron evaluados con la misma periodicidad. Resultados: el grupo MK mostró menor intensidad del dolor con disminución significativa del consumo de morfina. Ambos grupos resultaron ser similares en cuanto a cifras de tensión arterial, frecuencia cardíaca, frecuencia respiratoria y saturación de oxígeno. Las náuseas y vómitos fueron los efectos adversos de mayor prevalencia, siendo superiores en el grupo morfina. Conclusiones: la asociación morfina-ketamina resultó útil en el control del dolor moderado-severo en pacientes sometidos a cirugía renal electiva.


Abstract: Introduction: acute postoperative pain delays the patient's functional recovery. Objective: to evaluate the utility of ketamine associated with morphine administered in intravenous boluses in the control of acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective renal surgery. Material and methods: we conducted a double-blind study in patients with moderate-severe postoperative pain undergoing elective renal surgery. Two groups were formed: group MK administered 0.05 mg/kg morphine plus 0.2 mg/kg ketamine and group M 0.05 mg/kg morphine plus 0.9% saline solution. Patients with pain of moderate-severe intensity according to the visual analogue scale received doses of morphine every 20 minutes until achieving light pain, recording the total consumption of morphine per patient. Blood pressure, heart and respiratory rates, oxygen saturation, and adverse effects were evaluated with the same periodicity. Results: MK group showed lower pain intensity with a significant decrease in morphine consumption. Both groups turned out to be similar in terms of blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and oxygen saturation Figures. Nausea and vomiting were the most prevalent adverse effects, being higher in the morphine group. Conclusions: the morphine-ketamine association was useful in the control of moderate-severe pain in patients undergoing elective renal surgery.

3.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; 44(12): 1083-1089, Dec. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1431605

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective To compare the efficacy of quadratus lumborum (QL) block and intrathecal morphine (M) for postcesarean delivery analgesia. Methods Thirty-one pregnant women with ≥ 37 weeks of gestation submitted to elective cesarean section were included in the study. They were randomly allocated to either the QL group (12.5 mg 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia and 0.3 ml/kg 0.2% bupivacaine for QL block) or the M group (12.5 mg bupivacaine 0.5% and 100 mcg of morphine in spinal anesthesia). The visual analog scale of pain, consumption of morphine and tramadol for pain relief in 48 hours, and side effects were recorded. Results Median pain score and/or pain variation were higher in the morphine group than in the QL group (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the consumption of morphine or tramadol between groups over time. Side effects such as pruritus, nausea, and vomiting were observed only in the morphine group. Conclusion Quadratus lumborum block and intrathecal morphine are effective for analgesia after cesarean section. Patients undergoing QL block had lower postoperative pain scores without the undesirable side effects of opioids such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus.


Resumo Objetivo Comparar a eficácia do bloqueio do quadrado lombar (QL) e da morfina intratecal (M) na analgesia pós-cesariana. Métodos Trinta e uma gestantes com ≥ 37 semanas de gestação submetidas a cesariana eletiva foram incluídas no estudo. Eles foram alocados aleatoriamente no grupo QL (12,5 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5% para raquianestesia e 0,3 ml/kg de bupivacaína a 0,2% para bloqueio de QL) ou no grupo M (12,5 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5% e 100 mcg de morfina na raquianestesia). A escala visual analógica de dor, consumo de morfina e tramadol para alívio da dor em 48 horas e efeitos colaterais foram registrados. Resultados A mediana do escore de dor e/ou variação da dor foi maior no grupo morfina do que no grupo QL (p = 0,02). Não houve diferença significativa no consumo de morfina ou tramadol entre os grupos ao longo do tempo. Efeitos colaterais como prurido, náuseas e vômitos foram observados apenas no grupo morfina. Conclusão O bloqueio QL e a morfina intratecal são eficazes para analgesia após cesariana. Os pacientes submetidos ao bloqueio do QL apresentaram menores escores de dor pós-operatória sem os efeitos colaterais indesejáveis dos opioides, como náuseas, vômitos e prurido.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cesarean Section , Analgesia , Anesthesia, Obstetrical , Morphine/administration & dosage
4.
BrJP ; 5(3): 298-300, July-Sept. 2022.
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1403676

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peripheral neuropathy is a rare condition with many etiologies. Common symptoms are numbness, paresthesia, weakness and neuropathic pain. Treatment consists in frst-line agents such as anticonvulsants and some antidepressants. Te aim of this study was to report a case of chronic pain refractory to several therapies in a patient with absolute contraindication to the use of all anticonvulsants and antidepressants drugs. CASE REPORT: Female patient, a 40-year-old treated for trigeminal neuralgia with decompression that developed chronic occipital pain refractory to radiofrequency and onset of transient and bilateral T4 sensory and motor polyneuropathy after viral meningitis. In addition, she showed a severe pharmacodermy (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms- DRESS Syndrome) after using carbamazepine and other anticonvulsants, as well as allergy to all analgesics and opioids except morphine. Epidural puncture with insertion of a catheter was performed aiming at a 5-day test through intermittent epidural morphine bolus to assess the possibility of morphine pump implantation. CONCLUSION: The test was successful and the patient referred to the neurosurgery team. At the 6-month follow-up after the insertion of the morphine intrathecal pump, the strategy has proven to be efective in controlling pain secondary to polyneuropathy.


RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Neuropatia periférica é uma condição rara, de etiologia multifatorial. Dormência, parestesia, redução de força muscular e dor neuropática são sintomas comuns. O tratamento consiste em uso de anticonvulsivantes e antidepressivos. O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar o caso de dor crônica refratária a diversas terapias de uma paciente com contraindicação absoluta para uso de todos os fármacos anticonvulsivantes e antidepressivos. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente do sexo feminino, 40 anos, com história de neuralgia do trigêmeo abordada previamente com cirurgia, com cefaleia occipital crônica refratária à radiofrequência e polineuropatia bilateral T4 sensorial e motora após meningite viral. No curso do tratamento, apresentou grave farmacodermia (Drug Rash with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms - Síndrome DRESS) após o uso de carbamazepina e outros anticonvulsivantes, além de reação alérgica a todos analgésicos e opioides, exceto morfina. Optou-se por analgesia teste por via peridural, durante 5 dias, com bolus intermitentes e diários de morfina para avaliação de possibilidade de implante de bomba de morfina. CONCLUSÃO: O teste foi considerado bem-sucedido e a paciente encaminhada para neurocirurgia. No seguimento de 6 meses após implante de bomba por via subaracnoidea, esta estratégia se mostrou eficaz no controle da dor secundária à polineuropatia.

5.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, CUMED | ID: biblio-1408159

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La fractura de cadera en el anciano es una entidad frecuente y tiene gran incidencia en el mundo y en Cuba por el envejecimiento. Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia de la anestesia espinal con bupivacaína más morfina en la cirugía de fractura intertrocantérica de cadera. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio clínico, experimental, no aleatorizado, prospectivo y de corte longitudinal en el Hospital Universitario Faustino Pérez Hernández de Matanzas de octubre de 2017 a octubre de 2019. El universo estuvo conformado por todos los pacientes quirúrgicos con fractura de cadera del hospital. La muestra se realizó por muestreo intencional, por 120 pacientes elegidos a criterio de los investigadores. Grupo control (B): Anestesia subaracnoidea con bupivacaína 0,5 por ciento 10 mg. Grupo estudio (M): Anestesia subaracnoidea con bupivacaína 0,5 por ciento 7 mg más 0,2 mg de morfina. Cada grupo estuvo integrado por 60 pacientes. Las variables analizadas fueron las siguientes: grupos de edades, género, estado físico, nivel de punción, tiempo de inicio del bloqueo motor, hipotensión arterial, uso de vasopresores y complicaciones secundarias a la técnica anestésica. Resultados: Predominó grupo de 84 y 90 años, género femenino y ASA III. La punción lumbar se realizó entre L3-L4. El tiempo de inicio del bloqueo motor fue 1,3 veces menor en el grupo M. Prevaleció la hipotensión arterial en el grupo B; y uso de vasopresores en ambos grupos. Predominó el prurito, grupo M, y la bradicardia, grupo B como complicaciones. Conclusiones: La asociación bupivacaína/morfina en anestesia espinal en adulto mayor para fractura de cadera proporciona mejores resultados sin complicaciones mayores(AU),


Introduction: Hip fracture in the elderly patient is a frequent entity with a high incidence worldwide and in Cuba due to aging. Objective: To assess the efficacy of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine plus morphine in intertrochanteric hip fracture surgery. Methods: A clinical, experimental, nonrandomized, prospective, prospective and longitudinal study was carried out in Faustino Pérez Hernández University Hospital of Matanzas, from October 2017 to October 2019. The universe consisted of all surgical patients with hip fracture attended in the hospital. The sample was made by purposive sampling, consisting of 120 patients chosen at the discretion of the researchers. The control group (B) was administered subarachnoid anesthesia with 10 mg of bupivacaine 0.5 percent. The study group (M) was administered subarachnoid anesthesia with 7 mg of bupivacaine 0.5 percent. plus 0.2 mg of morphine. Each group consisted of 60 patients. The following variables were analyzed: age groups, gender, physical condition, puncture level, motor block onset time, arterial hypotension, use of vasopressors, and complications secondary to the anesthetic technique. Results: The predominant age group was 84 and 90 years old, together with female gender and ASA III. Lumbar puncture was performed between L3 and L4. The motor block onset time was 1.3 times shorter in the M group. Arterial hypotension prevailed in the B group; apart from the use of vasopressors in both groups. As complications, there was a predominance of pruritus in the M group and bradycardia in the B group. Conclusions: The association bupivacaine/morphine in spinal anesthesia for hip fracture among elderly adults provides better outcomes without major complications(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over
6.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UY-BNMED, BNUY | ID: biblio-1383556

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Se describe la evolución de un paciente que recibe morfina intratecal mediante una bomba de infusión, que le fuera implantada hace 14 años para tratamiento de su dolor lumbar crónico post-laminectomía. Material y método: Requería la administración de 60 mg/día de morfina subcutánea que le provocaban efectos secundarios que no toleraba, y múltiples internaciones para control del dolor. Se le implantó una bomba de infusión continua (Isomed) conectada a un catéter subaracnoideo, que libera 1 ml/día, y requiere ser llenada cada 60 días. Resultados: Se observó una disminución del dolor promedio de 50% al año, y de 75% a los 6 y 14 años. Requirió un aumento progresivo de las dosis de llenado, que pasaron de 30 mg de morfina (0.5 mg/día) al inicio, a 40 mg de morfina (0.66 mg /día) al año, a 70 mg de morfina (1.16 mg/día) a los 6 años, a 140 mg (2.33 mg/día) a los 14 años. No se registraron complicaciones médicas graves. Mantuvo constipación y sudoración durante todo el período, e instaló un hipogonadismo secundario con trastornos de la libido y de la erección que fueron corregidos con la administración de testosterona. No requirió más internaciones por dolor. No se observaron complicaciones relacionadas con el funcionamiento o llenado de la bomba, ni vinculadas al catéter. El paciente manifestó estar satisfecho con el implante. Discusión: A pesar del aumento de las dosis de llenado, expresión del desarrollo de tolerancia, las dosis de morfina/día requeridas son francamente inferiores al límite recomendado. Conclusiones: El balance del riesgo-beneficio del implante resultó positivo, considerando el mejor control del dolor logrado, las menores dosis de morfina utilizadas, así como la ausencia de complicaciones graves y de internaciones para control del dolor.


Introduction: The evolution of a patient receiving intrathecal morphine through an infusion pump that was implanted 14 years ago for the treatment of chronic post-laminectomy low back pain is described. Material and method: It required the administration of 60 mg / day of subcutaneous morphine that caused side effects that did not tolerate, and multiple hospitalizations for pain control. He was implanted with a continuous infusion pump (Isomed) connected to a subarachnoid catheter, which releases 1 ml / day, and needs to be filled every 60 days. Results: An average pain decrease of 50% per year, and 75% at 6 and 12 years was observed. It required a progressive increase in filling doses, which went from 30 mg of morphine (0.5 mg / day) at the beginning, to 40 mg of morphine (0.66 mg / day at the first year, to 70 mg of morphine (1.16 mg / day) at the sixth year, at 140 mg (2.33 mg / day) at the fourteen year. No serious medical complications were recorded, he maintained constipation and sweating throughout the period, and installed secondary hypogonadism with libido and erection disorders, that were corrected with the administration of testosterone. No further hospitalizations were required due to pain. No complications were observed related to the operation or filling of the pump or linked to the catheter. The patient stated that he was satisfied with the implant. Discussion: Despite the increase in filling doses, expression of tolerance development, the required morphine / day doses are frankly below the recommended limit. Conclusions: The risk-benefit balance of the implant was positive, considering the best pain control, the lowest doses used, the absence of serious complications, and the lack of hospitalizations for pain control.


Introdução: Descreve-se a evolução de um paciente que recebeu morfina intratecal através de uma bomba de infusão, implantada há 14 anos para o tratamento de lombalgia crônica pós-laminectomia. Material e método: Necessitou de administração de 60 mg/dia de morfina por via subcutânea, que provocou efeitos colaterais intolerantes, e múltiplas internações para controle da dor. Foi implantada uma bomba de infusão contínua (Isomed) conectada a um cateter subaracnóideo, que libera 1 ml/dia, necessitando de reenchimento a cada 60 dias. Resultados: Observou-se redução média da dor de 50% em um ano e 75% em 6 e 14 anos. Foi necessário um aumento progressivo das doses de enchimento, que passaram de 30 mg de morfina (0,5 mg/dia) no início, para 40 mg de morfina (0,66 mg/dia) por ano, para 70 mg de morfina (1,16 mg/dia) dia) aos 6 anos, para 140 mg (2,33 mg/dia) aos 14 anos. Não foram registradas complicações médicas graves. Manteve constipação e sudorese durante todo o período e desenvolveu hipogonadismo secundário com distúrbios de libido e ereção que foram corrigidos com administração de testosterona. Ele não necessitou de mais hospitalizações por dor. Não foram observadas complicações relacionadas à operação ou enchimento da bomba, ou relacionadas ao cateter. O paciente afirmou estar satisfeito com o implante. Discussão: Apesar do aumento das doses de enchimento, expressão do desenvolvimento da tolerância, as doses necessárias de morfina/dia são francamente inferiores ao limite recomendado. Conclusões: A relação risco-benefício do implante foi positiva, considerando o melhor controle da dor alcançado, as menores doses de morfina utilizadas, bem como a ausência de complicações graves e internações para controle da dor.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Infusion Pumps, Implantable , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain Measurement , Injections, Spinal , Treatment Outcome , Risk Assessment , Catheters , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Morphine/adverse effects
7.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 88(3): 427-433, May-June 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1384178

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction Children undergoing tonsillectomy have severe pain in the postoperative period. One of the pharmacological options for analgesia is opioids, such as morphine. However, the risks of adverse effects, such as increased recovery time from anesthesia and respiratory depression, can limit its use. Objectives To evaluate the use of intraoperative intravenous morphine to reduce immediate postoperative pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Methods In this double-blind randomized study, children aged 3-10 years were submitted to tonsillectomy, with or without adenoidectomy, and divided into two groups. Children in group M received 0.1 mg/kg of intravenous morphine during anesthetic induction, while those in the control group received conventional anesthesia without morphine. Postoperative pain perceptions were assessed at 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240 min after recovery from anesthesia, by the children themselves and also by their parents or guardians, using a facial pain scale. Results A total of 57 children were included, 30 in the group with morphine and 27 in the group without morphine. According to the children themselves, the postoperative pain was less at the evaluations performed at 30 min after awakening from anesthesia (p= 0.023), while according to their parents/guardians, the pain was less intense in the evaluations performed at 30 (p= 0.002), 60 (p= 0.006) and 180 min (p= 0.007) after awakening. Moreover, postoperative analgesics were less requested by children in the morphine group. No observed side effects were associated with the use of morphine. Conclusion A single dose of intravenous morphine during anesthetic induction reduced the intensity of immediate postoperative pain in children undergoing tonsillectomy, without increasing the time of awakening from anesthesia and with lower consumption of rescue analgesics.


Resumo Introdução Crianças submetidas a amigdalectomias apresentam dor intensa no pós-operatório. Uma das opções farmacológicas de analgesia são os opioides, como a morfina. No entanto, os riscos de efeitos adversos, como aumento do tempo de recuperação da anestesia e depressão respiratória, podem limitar o seu uso. Objetivos Avaliar o uso de morfina endovenosa intraoperatória na redução da dor pós-operatória imediata de crianças submetidas a amigdalectomia. Método Neste estudo cego randomizado, crianças de 3 a 10 anos foram submetidas a amigdalectomia, com ou sem adenoidectomia, e divididas em dois grupos. As crianças do grupo M receberam 0,1 mg.kg-1 de morfina endovenosa na indução anestésica, enquanto as do grupo controle receberam anestesia convencional sem morfina. As percepções de dor no pós-operatório foram avaliadas aos 30, 60, 120, 180 e 240 min após a recuperação da anestesia, pelas próprias crianças e também pelos seus pais ou responsáveis, com uma escala de dor pela face. Resultados Foram incluídas 57 crianças, 30 no grupo com morfina e 27 no grupo sem morfina. De acordo com as próprias crianças, a dor pós-operatória foi menor durante as avaliações feitas aos 30 minutos após o despertar da anestesia (p = 0,023), enquanto segundo seus pais/responsáveis a dor foi menos intensa nas avaliações feitas aos 30 (p = 0,002), 60 (p = 0,006) e 180 minutos (p = 0,007) após o despertar. Além disto, analgésicos no pós-operatório foram menos solicitados pelas crianças do grupo da morfina. Não foram observados efeitos colaterais associados ao uso da morfina. Conclusão Uma dose única de morfina endovenosa durante a indução anestésica reduziu a intensidade da dor pós-operatória imediata de crianças submetidas a amigdalectomia, sem aumento do tempo de despertar da anestesia e com menor consumo de analgésicos de resgate.

8.
Prensa méd. argent ; 108(3): 120-125, 20220000. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1373050

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El manejo inmediato del dolor postoperatorio es esencial para una comodidad y rehabilitación temprana del paciente Este estudio busca evaluar el efecto analgésico postoperatorio inmediato en cirugías de columna lumbosacra por vía posterior, como los efectos adversos con la administración de analgesia intratecal, usando Clonidina contra Morfina. Material y métodos: Es un estudio analítico de intervención, cuasi experimental, prospectivo, longitudinal, comparativo, doble ciego. Para comparar la eficacia de la analgesia intratecal post operatoria inmediata en cirugías de columna lumbosacra primarias por vía posterior y los efectos adversos. Los pacientes se distribuyeron en dos grupos previamente designados, a un grupo se le administro Clonidina 0.5 microgramos/kg/peso y a otro grupo Morfina 5 microgramos/Kg/Peso. intratecal, intraoperatorio. Resultados: Existió diferencia estadísticamente significativa con mejor manejo del dolor postoperatorio en las primeras horas y menor presencia de vómitos en el grupo de pacientes que se utilizó Clonidina intratecal. No existió diferencia estadísticamente significativa de ambas medicaciones intratecales en la valoración de otros efectos adversos. Discusión: El uso de la analgesia intratecal ha ido ganando relevancia en el tiempo y se fueron sumando estudios para ver la eficacia de diferentes medicamentos, diferentes dosis, menor presencia de efectos adversos. El estudio analiza estas variables buscando una mejor opción terapéutica. Tenemos a favor una muestra representativa a pesar de no ser aleatoria, estricto seguimiento, y análisis estadístico adecuado. Conclusión: La Clonidina intratecal es más efectiva para manejo del dolor post operatorio inmediato de cirugías de columna lumbosacra por vía posterior y con menor presencia de efectos adversos


Introduction: Immediate postoperative pain management is essential for the patient's greater comfort and early rehabilitation. Te goal of this study is to evaluate the immediate analgesic postoperative effect in posterior lumbosacral spine surgery, as well as the adverse effects of the administration of intrathecal analgesia, using Clonidine versus Morphine. Material and methods: An analytical, quasi-experimental, prospective, longitudinal, comparative, double-blinded intervention study was conducted to compare the efficacy of immediate postoperative intrathecal analgesia in primary posterior lumbosacral spine surgery, and the adverse effects. Te patients were divided into two previously designated groups. One group received Clonidine 0.5 microgramos/kg and the other group received Morphine 5 microgramos/kg. Intrathecal, intraoperative. Results: Tere was a statistically significant difference with better postoperative pain management in the first hours and less vomiting in the group of patients who received intrathecal Clonidine. Tere was no statistically significant difference between both intrathecal medications in the evaluation of other adverse effects. Discussion: Te use of intrathecal analgesia, has been on the rise over time and more studies have been conducted to see the efficacy of different drugs, different doses, with fewer adverse effects. Tis study to analyze these variables with a view to finding a better therapeutic option. Te advantage is having a representative if not random sample, strict follow-up, and appropriate statistical analysis Conclusion: Intrathecal Clonidine proved to be more effective in immediate postoperative pain management after posterior lumbosacral spine surgery and with fewer adverse effects


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Pain Measurement , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Double-Blind Method , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Clonidine/administration & dosage , Aftercare , Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Lumbosacral Region/surgery , Morphine/administration & dosage
9.
Rev. colomb. enferm ; 20(3): 1-18, Diciembre 31, 2021.
Article in Spanish | LILACS, BDENF, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1379966

ABSTRACT

actualmente existe una intensa prescripción de opioides para el manejo de todo tipo de dolor a nivel clínico, razón por la cual es importante considerar los posibles daños derivados de esta actividad, tales como tolerancia, adicción, dependencia y sobredosis. La medicación de opiáceos o sus derivados de manera irracional para el manejo del dolor agudo o crónico puede ser la puerta de entrada a las drogodependencias. Muchos adictos a opiáceos informaron haber estado expuestos por primera vez a los opioides a través de una prescripción médica para el tratamiento del dolor. Por ello, es importante evaluar por parte de los profesionales de la salud el uso a largo plazo de estos medicamentos para el manejo del dolor, porque estudios han evidenciado una relación entre el uso clínico y la dependencia de estos, sobre todo en adolescentes y adultos jóvenes sin experiencia en opiáceos que fueron sometidos a procedimientos quirúrgicos y dentales.


Currently, opioids for managing all types of pain are increasingly prescribed at the clinical level, which is why it is important to consider the potential harms derived from this practice, such as tolerance, addiction, dependence, and overdose. Irrational medication of opioids or opioid derivatives for acute or chronic pain management can be the gateway to drug dependence. Many opioid addicts reported first being exposed to opioids after receiving a physician's prescription for pain management. Therefore, health professionals need to evaluate the long-term use of these medications to manage pain because studies have shown a relationship between clinical use and opioid dependence, especially in adolescents and young adults who had never received opioid therapy and who underwent surgical and dental procedures


Atualmente existe uma intensa prescrição de opioides para o manejo de todos os tipos de dor em nível clínico, por isso é importante considerar os possíveis danos decorrentes dessa atividade, como tolerância, adição, dependência e overdose. A medicação de opiáceos ou seus derivados de forma irracional para o manejo da dor aguda ou crônica pode ser a porta de entrada para a adição a drogas. Muitos dependentes de opioides relataram ter sido expostos a opioides pela primeira vez por meio de uma receita médica para o tratamento da dor. Por esse motivo, é importante que os profissionais de saúde avaliem o uso prolongado desses medicamentos para o manejo da dor, pois estudos têm mostrado relação entre o uso clínico e a dependência dos mesmos, principalmente em adolescentes e adultos jovens sem experiência com opioides que foram submetidos a procedimentos cirúrgicos e odontológicos


Subject(s)
Pain , Substance-Related Disorders , Opiate Alkaloids , Analgesia , Morphine
10.
Online braz. j. nurs. (Online) ; 20: e20216500, 05 maio 2021. ilus
Article in English, Spanish, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1248393

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Mapear as práticas de segurança do paciente realizadas em pacientes oncológicos paliativos em uso de morfina para o controle da dor. MÉTODO: Revisão de escopo para responder à pergunta: Quais as evidências sobre as práticas de segurança do paciente realizadas em pacientes oncológicos paliativos que fazem uso de morfina para o controle da dor? A busca será realizada nas bases de dados MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane e CINAHL e literatura cinzenta. Após a busca, todos as citações serão agrupadas no software Rayyan e as duplicatas removidas. Os títulos e resumos serão selecionados por dois revisores independentes. O texto completo das citações selecionadas será avaliado em detalhes em relação aos critérios de inclusão por dois revisores independentes. Os dados extraídos serão apresentados em um diagrama ou forma tabular de maneira que se alinhe com o objetivo desta revisão de escopo, e um resumo narrativo será fornecido


OBJECTIVE: To map the patient safety practices performed in palliative cancer patients using morphine for pain control. METHOD: A scoping review to answer the following question: What is the evidence on the patient safety practices performed in palliative cancer patients using morphine for pain control? The search will be carried out in the MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane and CINAHL databases, as well as in the gray literature. After the search, all citations will be grouped in the Rayyan software and the duplicates will be removed. Titles and abstracts will be selected by two independent reviewers. The full text of the selected citations will be evaluated in detail in relation to the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. The extracted data will be presented in diagram or table formats so that it aligns with the objective of this scoping review, and a narrative abstract will be provided.


OBJETIVO: Mapear las prácticas de seguridad del paciente realizadas en pacientes con cáncer paliativo que utilizan morfina para el control del dolor. MÉTODO: Revisión de alcance para responder a la pregunta: ¿Cuál es la evidencia sobre las prácticas de seguridad del paciente que se implementan en pacientes con cáncer paliativo que utilizan morfina para el control del dolor? La búsqueda se realizará en las bases de datos MEDLINE, LILACS, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane y CINAHL y literatura gris. Después de la búsqueda, todas las citas se agruparán en el software Rayyan y se eliminarán los duplicados. Los títulos y resúmenes serán seleccionados por dos revisores independientes. El texto completo de las citas seleccionadas será evaluado en detalle según los criterios de inclusión por dos revisores independientes. Los datos extraídos se presentarán en un diagrama o en forma de tabla para que se alineen con el objetivo de esta revisión de alcance, y se proporcionará un resumen narrativo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Palliative Care , Pain Management , Patient Safety , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use
11.
Oncología (Guayaquil) ; 30(3): 192-202, Diciembre 30, 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1145692

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El dolor oncológico frecuentemente incapacita y desanima a los pacientes, adicionalmente produce frustración no solo al paciente sino también al equipo que realiza el cuidado. En un momento dado los opiodes ya no alivian el dolor y se requieren medidas coayuvantes para tener los mismos resultados. El objetivo de este trabajo fue comparar la eficacia analgésica con morfina + ketamina en relación a morfina sola en pacientes oncológicos que no responden a opioides. Métodos: El presente estudio observacional retrospectivo, fue realizado en el Instituto Oncológico Nacional "Dr. Juan Tanca Marengo" SOLCA-Guayaquil, con datos de enero del 2014 a diciembre del 2015. Se incluyeron todos los registros clínicos de pacientes mayores a 17 años que ingresaron a sala de urgencias o en hospitalización en quienes se realizó un tratamiento paliativo del dolor de tipo oncológico, con una escala de Karnofsky ≥ 40. El grupo 1 (G1) se conformó con pacientes cuyo tratamiento fue en base solamente con morfina con una respuesta adecuada, el Grupo 2 (G2) fue constituido con pacientes en quienes se usó morfina + Ketamina debido a su falta de respuesta previa solamente al uso de morfina. Se midió la percepción del dolor en la escala visual analógica (EVA), dosis de morfina usada (número de dosis de rescate), dosis de Ketamina usada, efectos secundarios. La muestra fue no probabilística, tipo censo. Resultados: 81 pacientes ingresaron al estudio, 34/43mujeres (79%) en G1 y 24/38 (63%) en G2 P=0.113.58. En ambos grupos EVA al ingreso 7 a 10 (severo), después de la intervención terapéutica en G1 4 ± 1.25, en G2 3 ± 1.50 P=0.78. Dosis de Morfina en G1 10 ± 12.5 mg, en G2 20 ± 27.5 mg P= 0.406. Rescate analgésico en G1 29/43 (67%) en G2 19/38 (50%) OR 0.483 (IC95% 0.196-1.188) P=0.113. Efectos adversos no fueron diferentes en ambos grupos. Conclusión: La Ketamina usada como coadyuvante con morfina permite mantener el control el dolor en el grupo de pacientes que habitualmente no responden a Morfina con dolor oncológico, sin aumentar los efectos adversos. Palabras Claves: Ketamina, Anestesia, Morfina, Dolor en Cáncer, Neoplasias


Introduction: Cancer pain frequently disables and discourages patients, additionally it produces frustration not only for the patient but also for the team that performs the care. At one point, opioids no longer relieve pain and co-adjuvant measures are required to achieve the same results. The objective of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy with morphine + ketamine in relation to morphine alone in cancer patients who do not respond to opioids. Methods: The present retrospective observational study was carried out at the National Oncological Institute "Dr. Juan Tanca Marengo "SOLCA-Guayaquil, with data from January 2014 to December 2015. All clinical records of patients older than 17 years who were admitted to the emergency room or hospitalized who underwent palliative treatment of pain from Oncological type, with a Karnofsky scale ≥ 40. Group 1 (G1) was made up of patients whose treatment was based solely on morphine with an adequate response, Group 2 (G2) was made up of patients in whom morphine + was used Ketamine due to lack of response prior to morphine use only. The perception of pain was measured on the visual analog scale (VAS), dose of morphine used (number of rescue doses), dose of Ketamine used, side effects. The sample was non-probabilistic, census type. Results: 81 patients entered the study, 34/43 women (79%) in G1 and 24/38 (63%) in G2 P = 0.113.58. In both groups, VAS at admission 7 to 10 (severe), after the therapeutic intervention in G1 4 ± 1.25, in G2 3 ± 1.50 P = 0.78. Morphine dose in G1 10 ± 12.5 mg, in G2 20 ± 27.5 mg P = 0.406. Analgesic rescue in G1 29/43 (67%) in G2 19/38 (50%) OR 0.483 (95% CI 0.196-1.188) P = 0.113. Adverse effects were not different in both groups. Conclusion: Ketamine used as an adjuvant with morphine allows to maintain pain control in the group of patients who usually do not respond to morphine with cancer pain, without increasing adverse effects. Keywords: Ketamine, Anesthesia, Morphine, Cancer Pain, Neoplasms


Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia , Ketamine , Morphine , Cancer Pain , Neoplasms
12.
An. Fac. Cienc. Méd. (Asunción) ; 53(3): 71-80, 20201201.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1177490

ABSTRACT

Introducción: La morfina es un alcaloide obtenido del opio. Su conocimiento y aplicaciones son desconocidas en la práctica médica diario. La utilización ineficiente de analgésicos produce que el dolor sea refractario. Entre los médicos existen reticencias al uso de opioides como la morfina por varios mitos que debemos desmentir. Objetivos: Evaluar el conocimiento de los médicos de diversas especialidades en el INCAN (Instituto Nacional del Cáncer) y el HRE (Hospital Regional de Encarnación) sobre la morfina, como sus formas de presentación, indicaciones, contraindicaciones y precio en el mercado libre de Paraguay. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, los datos se recolectaron a través de una encuesta anónima auto administrada. La n fue de 41, entre médicos del INCAN y el HRE. Se utilizó la prueba estadística de Chi2 para el análisis estadístico. SPSS 20 fue utilizado. Resultados: El 46,3 % eran médicos del INCAN, el 53,7 % eran médicos del HRE. Edad media fue 30,17 años DE ± 5,56. el análisis estadístico con Chi2 cruzando variables centro y número de respuestas correctas de los integrantes no fue significativa. Los resultados en cuanto a las dosis, indicaciones y efectos secundarios fueron negativas para ambas entidades, reforzando un bajo nivel de conocimiento sobre las generalidades. La gran mayoría de los médicos refiere que su uso produce adicciones y depresión respiratoria. Conclusión: Se demuestra que hay desconocimiento sobre el uso de la morfina que imposibilita un tratamiento adecuado del dolor por los mitos y el miedo de los efectos secundarios.


Introduction: Morphine is an alkaloid obtained from opium. Its knowledge and applications are unknown in daily medical practice. The inefficient use of analgesics causes pain to be refractory. Among doctors there are reluctance to use opioids such as morphine for several myths that we must deny. Objectives: To evaluate the knowledge of doctors of various specialties at INCAN (National Cancer Institute) and HRE (Regional Hospital of Encarnación) about morphine, as its forms of presentation, indications, contraindications and price in the free market of Paraguay. Materials and methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study, data were collected through a self-administered anonymous survey. The number was 41, between INCAN and HRE doctors. The Chi2 statistical test was used for statistical analysis. SPSS 20 was used. Results: 46.3% were INCAN doctors, 53.7% were HRE doctors. Mean age was 30.17 years SD ± 5.56. The statistical analysis with Chi2 crossing center variables and number of correct answers of the members was not significant. The results regarding doses, indications and side effects were negative for both entities, reinforcing a low level of knowledge about the generalities. The vast majority of doctors report that its use causes addictions and respiratory depression. Conclusion: It is shown that there is ignorance about the use of morphine that makes it impossible to properly treat pain due to myths and fear of side effects.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Morphine , Neoplasms , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Surveys and Questionnaires , Research Report
13.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 70(2): 153-158, Mar.-Apr. 2020. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1137159

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective This study aimed to investigate the impact of post-thoracotomy analgesia with dexmedetomidine and morphine on immunocytes. Methods A total of 118 patients with post-thoracotomy Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia (PCIA) in our hospital from March 2016 to July 2018 were randomly selected and divided into the Composite (COM) Group (57 patients administered with dexmedetomidine [1.0 µg.kg-1 body weight] and morphine [0.48 mg.kg-1 body weight]) and the Morphine (MOR) group (61 patients administered with morphine [0.48 mg.kg-1]). The values of lymphocyte subsets (CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+) and Natural Killer cells in the peripheral blood of these two groups were detected by FACSCalibur flow cytometry at different time points (before anesthesia induction [T0], immediately after tracheal extubation [T1], 12 hours after surgery [T2], 24 hours after surgery [T3], 48 hours after surgery [T4], 72 hours after surgery [T5], and 7 days after surgery [T6]). The doses of morphine at T3 to T5 and the adverse reactions between the two groups were also recorded and compared. Results The CD3+ level and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio at T2 to T5 and the CD4+ level and NK cells at T3 to T5 were significantly higher in the COM Group than in the MOR Group (p< 0.05). The postoperative morphine dose and the incidence of postoperative itching, nausea, and vomiting were significantly lower in the COM Group than in the MOR Group (p< 0.05). Conclusions Dexmedetomidine combined with morphine for post-thoracotomy PCIA can improve the function of immunocytes, reduce morphine consumption, and reduce the adverse reactions during analgesia induction.


Resumo Objetivo Estudar o impacto em linfócitos causado pelo uso da dexmedetomidina associada à morfina para analgesia pós-toracotomia. Método Um total de 118 pacientes utilizando Analgesia Intravenosa Controlada pelo Paciente (AICP) pós-toracotomia em nosso hospital, de março de 2016 a julho de 2018, foram selecionados aleatoriamente e divididos em dois grupos: o Grupo Combinado [COM, 57 pacientes que receberam dexmedetomidina (1,0 µg.kg-1 de peso corpóreo) associada à morfina (0,48 mg.kg-1 de peso corpóreo)] e o Grupo Morfina [MOR, 61 pacientes, que receberam somente morfina (0,48 mg.kg-)]. Os valores dos subconjuntos de linfócitos (CD3+, CD4+ e CD8+) e das células NK no sangue periférico desses dois grupos foram medidos por citometria de fluxo FACSCalibur em diferentes momentos do estudo [antes da indução anestésica (T0), imediatamente após extubação traqueal (T1), 12 horas após a cirurgia (T2), 24 horas após a cirurgia (T3), 48 horas após a cirurgia (T4), 72 horas após a cirurgia (T5) e 7 dias após a cirurgia (T6)]. As doses de morfina do momento T3 ao T5 e as reações adversas entre os dois grupos também foram registradas e comparadas. Resultados O nível de CD3+ e a razão CD4+/CD8+ de T2 a T5, e o nível de CD4+ e as células NK de T3 a T5 do Grupo COM foram significantemente maiores (p< 0,05) quando comparados ao Grupo MOR. A dose de morfina no pós-operatório e a incidência de prurido, náusea e vômito no pós-operatório foram significantemente menores no grupo MOR (p< 0,05). Conclusões Dexmedetomidina combinada com morfina para AICP no período pós-toracotomia pode melhorar a função dos linfócitos, reduzir o consumo de morfina e diminuir reações adversas durante a analgesia.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Thoracotomy , Killer Cells, Natural/drug effects , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled , Lymphocyte Subsets/drug effects , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/pharmacology , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Morphine/pharmacology , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Morphine/therapeutic use
14.
Rev. chil. anest ; 49(4): 548-559, 2020. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1511829

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: 100 mcg intrathecal morphine (ITM) for hip arthroplasty provides adequate functional recovery and reduces associated complications but is not exempt from opioid-related adverse effects. We evaluate efficacy of a reduced dose of ITM (80 mcg) in terms of anesthetic quality, postoperative analgesia, complication rates and early recovery. METHODS: Case control study. Patients under hip arthroplasty were treated on a specific protocol, using neuraxial anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10.5-13.5 mg plus 80 mcg ITM versus controls with 100 mcg ITM. Demographic variables, intra and perioperative course were extracted from medical records. Pain severity and morphine associated complications were blindly assessed at regular intervals postoperatively. p < 0.01 were considered significant. RESULTS: 82 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 64.21 years, 62.20% women and 70.73% ASA-2. Main endoprosthesis indication was arthrosis (58.53%). No statistically significant differences in demographic and operative data were found between groups, including surgical time, ambulation time, length of stay, and patient satisfaction for pain management. Mean VAS for pain during first 24 hours was 0.24 for the low ITM group and 0.22 for control. Rescue intravenous morphine was the same between groups. Compared to 80 mcg ITM, 100 mcg showed trends for higher complication rates for respiratory depression (OR 2.58, CI 95% 0.4514.54, p = 0.28), nausea without vomiting (OR 1.82, CI 95% 0.82-4.01, p = 0.13), urinary retention (OR 2.02, CI95% 0.88-4.61, p = 0.09) and significantly higher rates of pruritus (OR 3.55, CI 95% 1.61-7.82, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: 80 mcg ITM during spinal anesthesia for hip arthroplasty provided comparable postoperative analgesia and lower incidence of opioid-related adverse effects.


OBJETIVOS: 100 mcg morfina intratecal (ITM), en artroplastía de cadera, proporciona una recuperación funcional adecuada y reduce complicaciones asociadas, pero no está exento de efectos adversos conocidos asociados a opioides. Evaluamos eficacia de reducir dosis (80 mcg ITM) en términos de calidad anestésica, analgesia, complicaciones y recuperación postoperatoria. MÉTODOS: Estudio de casos y controles. Pacientes sometidos a artroplastía de cadera fueron tratados con anestesia espinal con bupivacaína hiperbárica 10,5-13,5 mg más 80 mcg ITM y controles de manera similar, pero con 100 mcg ITM. Variables demográficas, así como intra y perioperatorio, se extrajeron de registros médicos. Severidad del dolor, y complicaciones asociadas a ITM, se evaluaron a ciegas según protocolo. p < 0,01 fue considerado significativo. RESULTADOS: 82 pacientes analizados. Edad promedio fue 64,21 años, 62,20% fueron mujeres y 70,73% ASA-2. Principal indicación de prótesis fue artrosis (58,53%). No se encontraron diferencias estadísticas entre variables demográficas, tiempo quirúrgico, tiempo deambulación, duración hospitalización y satisfacción paciente. EVA promedio dolor, primeras 24 horas, fue 0,24 para grupo 80 mcg ITM y 0,22 para control (100 mcg ITM). Morfina intravenosa de rescate fue similar entre grupos. En comparación con 80 mcg, 100 mcg presentó mayores tasas de complicaciones para depresión respiratoria (OR 2,58, IC 95% 0,45-14,54, p = 0,28), náuseas y vómitos (OR 1,82, CI 95% 0,82-4,01, p = 0,13), retención urinaria (OR 2,02, CI 95% 0,88-4,61, p = 0,09) y prurito (OR 3,55, CI 95% 1,61-7.82, p < 0,01). CONCLUSIONES: 80 mcg ITM, en anestesia espinal para artroplastía cadera, proporciona analgesia postoperatoria comparable a 100 mcg, pero con menor incidencia de efectos adversos relacionados a opioides.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Injections, Spinal , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Patient Satisfaction , Recovery of Function , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Morphine/adverse effects
15.
Rev. cientif. cienc. med ; 23(2): 184-191, 2020.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1358299

ABSTRACT

El uso de coadyuvantes en anestesia obstétrica es útil para disminuir la dosis de los anestésicos locales. En boga la adición de un nuevo fármaco como es la dexmedetomidina espinal que abarca de 5 µg a 10 µg en el reporte mundial. OBJETIVOS: comparar el efecto de la administración espinal de la dexmedetomidina y morfina, más bupivacaina pesada en pacientes sometidas a cesárea. MÉTODOS: ensayo clínico, doble ciego y prospectivo de 99 pacientes randomizados en 3 grupos: grupo D2 (fentanilo 10 µg, bupivacaina 9 mg y dexmedetomidina 2 µg); grupo D3 (fentanilo 10 µg, bupivacaina 9 mg y dexmedetomidina 3 µg) y grupo M (fentanilo 10 µg, bupivacaina 9 mg y morfina 100 µg). Evaluación de parámetros hemodinámicos, duración de bloqueo motor, necesidad de vasopresores y complicaciones. Análisis estadístico: ANOVA para variables cuantitativas, para variables nominales se empleó chi cuadrado. Valor de p <0.05 es significativo. RESULTADOS: la duración más prolongada del bloqueo motor fue en el grupo D2 (140,3 ± 30,7minutos), seguido del grupo de D3 (142,4 ± 16 minutos) y el grupo M (107 ± 14,6). En los grupos con dexmedetomidina se tiene sedación y estabilidad hemodinámica, la necesidad de rescate fue en el grupo M; la cantidad de vasopresores que se utilizó fue de 1 ± 1,7 ml en el grupo D2; 1,8 ± 2,9 ml en el grupo D3 y 1,7 ± 2,1 ml en el grupo M. Hipotensión es la complicación más frecuente. CONCLUSIONES: dexmedetomidina 2 µg mejor estabilidad hemodinámica con prolongación del bloqueo motor y menor necesidad de vasopresores.


The use of adjuvants in obstetric anesthesia, useful to decrease the dose of local anesthetics. The addition of a new drug such as spinal dexmedetomidine ranging from 5 µg to 10 µg in the world report. OBJECTIVES: to compare the effect of spinal administration of dexmedetomidine and morphine plus hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: prospective double-blind clinical trial, 99 randomized patients in 3 groups: group D2 (fentanyl 10 µg, bupivacaine 9 mg and dexmedetomidine 2 µg); group D3 (fentanyl 10 µg, bupivacaine 9 mg and dexmedetomidine 3 µg) and group M (fentanyl 10 µg, bupivacaine 9 mg and morphine 100 µg). Evaluation of hemodynamic parameters, duration of motor block, need for vasopressor and complications. Statistical analysis: ANOVA for quantitative variables. Chi-squared tes was used for nominal variables. P value <0.05 is significant. RESULTS: the duration of the longer Motor Block was in the D2 group (140.3 ± 30.7 minutes), followed by the D3 group (142.4 ± 16 minutes) and the M group of 107 ± 14.6; In the dexmedetomidine groups, it has sedation and hemodynamic stability. The need for rescue was in group M; the amount of vasopressor used was 1 ± 1.7 ml in group D2; 1.8 ± 2.9 ml in group D3 and 1.7 ± 2.1 ml group M. Hypotension is the most frequent complication. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine 2 µg better hemodynamic stability with prolonged motor block and less need for vasopresor.


Subject(s)
Female , Adolescent , Adult , Bupivacaine , Fentanyl , Anesthesia
16.
Rev. chil. anest ; 49(1): 160-167, 2020.
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1510408

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVES: 100 mcg intrathecal morphine (ITM) for hip arthroplasty provides adequate functional recovery and reduces associated complications but is not exempt from opioid-related adverse effects. We evaluate efficacy of a reduced dose of ITM (80 mcg) in terms of anesthetic quality, postoperative analgesia, complication rates and early recovery. METHODS: Case-control study. Patients under hip arthroplasty were treated on a specific protocol, using neuraxial anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine 10.5-13.5 mg plus 80 mcg ITM versus controls with 100 mcg ITM. Demographic variables, intra and perioperative course were extracted from medical records. Pain severity and morphine associated complications were blindly assessed at regular intervals postoperatively. p < 0.01 were considered significant. RESULTS: 82 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 64.21 years, 62.20% women and 70.73% ASA-2. Main endoprosthesis indication was arthrosis (58.53%). No statistically significant differences in demographic and operative data were found between groups, including surgical time, ambulation time, length of stay, and patient satisfaction for pain management. Mean VAS for pain during first 24 hours was 0.24 for the low ITM group and 0.22 for control. Rescue intravenous morphine was the same between groups. Compared to 80 mcg ITM, 100 mcg showed trends for higher complication rates for respiratory depression (OR 2.58, CI 95% 0.45-14.54, p = 0.28), nausea without vomiting (OR 1.82, CI 95% 0.82-4.01, p = 0.13), urinary retention (OR 2.02, CI 95% 0.88-4.61, p = 0.09) and significantly higher rates of pruritus (OR 3.55, CI 95% 1.61-7.82, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: 80 mcg ITM during spinal anesthesia for hip arthroplasty provided comparable postoperative analgesia and lower incidence of opioid-related adverse effects.


OBJETIVOS: 100 mcg morfina intratecal (ITM), en artroplastia de cadera, proporciona una recuperación funcional adecuada y reduce complicaciones asociadas, pero no está exento de efectos adversos conocidos asociados a opioides. Evaluamos eficacia de reducir dosis (80 mcg ITM) en términos de calidad anestésica, analgesia, complicaciones y recuperación postoperatoria. MÉTODOS: Estudio de casos y controles. Pacientes sometidos a artroplastia de cadera fueron tratados con anestesia espinal con bupivacaína hiperbárica 10,5-13,5 mg más 80 mcg ITM y controles de manera similar pero con 100 mcg ITM. Variables demográficas, así como intra y perioperatorio, se extrajeron de registros médicos. Severidad del dolor, y complicaciones asociadas a ITM, se evaluaron a ciegas según protocolo, p < 0,01 fue considerado significativo. RESULTADOS: 82 pacientes analizados. Edad promedio fue 64,21 años, 62,20% fueron mujeres y 70,73% ASA-2. Principal indicación de prótesis fue artrosis (58,53%). No se encontraron diferencias estadísticas entre variables demográficas, tiempo quirúrgico, tiempo deambulación, duración hospitalización y satisfacción paciente. EVA promedio dolor, primeras 24 horas, fue 0,24 para grupo 80 mcg ITM y 0,22 para control (100 mcg ITM). Morfina intravenosa de rescate fue similar entre grupos. En comparación con 80 mcg, 100 mcg presentó mayores tasas de complicaciones para depresión respiratoria (OR 2,58, IC95% 0,45-14,54, p = 0,28), náuseas y vómitos (OR 1,82, CI95% 0,82-4,01, p = 0,13), retención urinaria (OR 2,02, CI95% 0,88-4,61, p = 0,09) y prurito (OR 3,55, CI95% 1,61-7,82, p < 0,01). CONCLUSIONES: 80 mcg ITM, en anestesia espinal para artroplastia cadera, proporciona analgesia postoperatoria comparable a 100 mcg pero con menor incidencia de efectos adversos relacionados a opioides.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Morphine/administration & dosage , Case-Control Studies , Treatment Outcome
17.
Rev. Pesqui. (Univ. Fed. Estado Rio J., Online) ; 12: 1116-1124, jan.-dez. 2020. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF | ID: biblio-1117816

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Objetivou-se realizar o estado da arte de publicações que relatem estratégias de como minimizar a constipação induzida pelo uso de opioides, de pacientes em cuidado paliativo. Método: Trata-se de um estudo exploratório através de uma revisão integrativa em quatro bases de dados de artigos publicados entre os anos de 2013 a 2017. Resultados: Evidenciaram-se 117 publicações, as quais 17 apresentaram os critérios de inclusão da pesquisa. Conclusão: Apesar das drogas aliviarem a dor, as reações adversas geram desconforto e perda da qualidade de vida. Existem dados limitados referentes ao tratamento da constipação intestinal em cuidado paliativo. Observou-se que poucos autores mencionaram a dieta como auxiliador no quadro, enfatizando o uso de medicamentos. Mais estudos devem ser estimulados no intuito de encontrar o equilíbrio entre analgesia e redução de efeitos adversos causados pelos opioides


Objective: The study's purpose has been to address the state of the art in investigations such as clinical trials, systematic reviews with metaanalysis and case studies, which report how to minimize opioid-induced constipation in patients undergoing palliative care. Methods: This is an exploratory study through an integrative review of four databases addressing published articles from 2013 to 2017. Results: A total of 117 publications were presented, which 17 presented the inclusion criteria. The studies describe the prevalence of constipation rates induced by the use of opioids. Conclusion: Although these drugs alleviate pain, the adverse reactions may generate discomfort and loss of the patient's life quality. There are limited data on the treatment of constipation. It was observed that few authors mentioned diet as a helper on this situation, emphasizing the use of medications. Further studies should be encouraged aiming to find the balance between analgesia and reduction of adverse effects


Objetivo: Se objetivó realizar el estado del arte de publicaciones que relatan estrategias de cómo minimizar el constipación inducida por el uso de opioides, de pacientes en cuidado paliativo. Método: Se trata de un estudio exploratorio a través de una revisión integrativa en cuatro bases de datos de artículos publicados entre los años de 2013 a 2017. Resultados: Se evidenció 117 publicaciones, las cuales 17 presentaron los criterios de inclusión de la investigación. Conclusión: A pesar de las drogas aliviar el dolor, las reacciones adversas generan incomodidad y pérdida de la calidad de vida. Existen datos limitados referentes al tratamiento del estreñimiento intestinal en el cuidado paliativo. Se observó que pocos autores mencionaron la dieta como auxiliador en el cuadro, enfatizando el uso de medicamentos. Más estudios deben ser estimulados con el fin de encontrar el equilibrio entre analgesia y reducción de efectos adversos causados por los opioide


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Palliative Care , Opioid-Induced Constipation/prevention & control , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Morphine/adverse effects
18.
Rev. cuba. anestesiol. reanim ; 18(3): e524, sept.-dic. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | CUMED, LILACS | ID: biblio-1093119

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El dolor posoperatorio constituye la principal causa de dolor agudo en el mundo. Brindar analgesia adecuada en el posquirúrgico garantiza la disminución de la estadía hospitalaria y tiene un impacto positivo en el resultado final de las intervenciones. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de la analgesia posoperatoria con bupivacaína más morfina intratecal en la cirugía de próstata. Métodos: Se realizó una investigación cuasiexperimental, entre enero de 2015 y enero de 2018. La muestra quedó conformada de manera no probabilística por los pacientes que dieron su consentimiento informado y reunieron criterios para entrar en el estudio. Quedaron distribuidos de manera aleatoria en dos grupos denominados bupivacaína (B) y morfina-bupivacaína (MB). Para recolectar la información se emplearon las historias clínicas anestésicas y un formulario elaborado al efecto. Los resultados se mostraron en tablas y gráficos, se expresaron en frecuencias absolutas y en porcientos, se determinaron algunas medidas descriptivas de interés que mostraron el comportamiento de las variables que lo requirieron. Resultados: El resultado más relevante fue el efecto analgésico muy significativo en el grupo MB en las primeras 24 h del posoperatorio. La reacción adversa más frecuente fue el prurito y solo se presentó en el grupo que recibió morfina. Conclusiones: La anestesia espinal con morfina y bupivacaína es efectiva y segura, proporcionando mejor analgesia en el posoperatorio inmediato cuando se compara con bupivacaína sola(AU)


Introduction: Postoperative pain is the main cause of acute pain worldwide. Providing suitable analgesia in the postoperative period guarantees the reduction of hospital stay and has a positive impact on the final outcome of the interventions. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia with intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus morphine in prostate surgery. Methods: A quasiexperimental research was carried out between January 2015 and January 2018. The sample was nonprobabilistic and made up by the patients who gave their informed consent and met criteria to enter the study. They were randomly distributed into two groups called bupivacaine (B) and morphine-bupivacaine (MB). To collect the information, the anesthetic medical records and a form prepared for this purpose were used. The results were shown in tables and graphs, expressed in absolute frequencies and percentages, some descriptive measures of interest were determined which showed the behavior of the variables that required it. Results: The most relevant result was the very significant analgesic effect in the MB group in the first 24 hours after surgery. The most frequent adverse reaction was pruritus and only occurred in the group that received morphine. Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia with morphine and bupivacaine is effective and safe, providing better analgesia in the immediate postoperative period when compared with bupivacaine alone(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pruritus/complications , Bupivacaine/therapeutic use , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods
19.
Rev. bras. anestesiol ; 69(2): 131-136, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1003408

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background: Postoperative pain is the most common postoperative complication. This study was conducted to assess the effect of acetaminophen versus fentanyl on postoperative pain relief in patients who underwent urologic surgeries. Methods: This clinical trial was conducted on patients aged 18-65 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2000 mg acetaminophen (propacetamol) or 2 mcg.kg-1 fentanyl intravenously, 15 min before the end of surgery. The postoperative pain was evaluated every 6 h for 24 h using the Visual Analog Scale. Total morphine dose taken in 24 h and hemodynamic status were evaluated. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled into the trial. The mean score of pain in 6, 12, 18, and 24 h after surgery was lower in the acetaminophen group than in the fentanyl group but the difference was not statistically significant except in 12 and 18 h after surgery (p < 0.05). The amount of administered morphine was higher in the fentanyl group than in the acetaminophen group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The hemodynamic status including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rates were nearly the same in the two groups but the SpO2 mean was significantly higher in the acetaminophen group than the fentanyl group. Conclusions: This trial indicated that intravenous acetaminophen is as effective as intravenous fentanyl in pain relief after urologic surgeries (transurethral lithotripsy).


Resumo Justificativa: A dor pós-operatória é a complicação mais comum no período pós-operatório. Este estudo foi realizado para avaliar o efeito de acetaminofeno versus fentanil no alívio da dor pós-operatória em pacientes submetidos a cirurgias urológicas. Métodos: Este ensaio clínico foi realizado com pacientes cujas idades variou entre 18 e 65 anos. Os pacientes foram randomicamente designados para receber 2.000 mg de acetaminofeno (propacetamol) ou 2 mcg.kg-1 de fentanil por via intravenosa 15 min antes do final da cirurgia. A dor pós-operatória foi avaliada a cada 6 horas por 24 horas, utilizando a escala visual analógica. A dose total de morfina administrada em 24 horas e o estado hemodinâmico foram avaliados. Resultados: Oitenta pacientes foram incluídos no estudo. O escore médio de dor em 6, 12, 18 e 24 horas após a cirurgia foi menor no grupo acetaminofeno que no grupo fentanil, mas a diferença não foi estatisticamente significativa, exceto em 12 e 18 horas após a cirurgia (p < 0,05). A quantidade de morfina administrada foi maior no grupo fentanil que no grupo acetaminofeno, mas a diferença não foi estatisticamente significativa. O estado hemodinâmico, incluindo pressão arterial sistólica e diastólica e frequência cardíaca, foi quase o mesmo nos dois grupos, mas a média de SpO2 foi significativamente maior no grupo acetaminofeno que no grupo fentanil. Conclusões: Este estudo indicou que acetaminofeno intravenoso é tão eficaz quanto fentanil intravenoso no alívio da dor após cirurgias urológicas (litotripsia transuretral).


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Young Adult , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Lithotripsy/methods , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Pain Measurement , Single-Blind Method , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravenous , Middle Aged
20.
Rev. colomb. anestesiol ; 47(1): 49-56, Jan.-Mar. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-985434

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: Heart failure is a chronic, progressive, prevalent disease, with a high impact on health systems and on the quality of life of patients and families. Dyspnea is a common symptom and management with opioids has been proposed. Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the literature pertaining to the use of opioids for the management of dyspnea in patients with stable chronic heart failure, functional class New York Heart Association (NYHA) II, III, or IV. Materials and methods: A systematic review was conducted in the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, OVID, LILACS, and PROSPERO databases of articles published in 5 languages between January 1, 1995 and July 31, 2018. Studies describing the administration of any type of opioid for the management of dyspnea in patients with stable chronic heart failure NYHA II, III, or IV were included. Results: Four clinical trials were obtained for the final analysis with a total number of 70 patients, describing opioid administration for the management of dyspnea in patients with stable chronic heart failure, NYHA II, III, or IV. Conclusion: In adult patients with compensated chronic heart failure under optimum treatment, there is low-quality evidence that shows benefit with the use of opioids for the management of dyspnea. For a stronger recommendation, controlled, randomized studies with a larger number of subjects are required.


Resumen Introducción: La insuficiencia cardiaca es una enfermedad crónica, progresiva, prevalente, con un alto impacto en los sistemas de salud y en la calidad de vida de los pacientes y sus familias, la disnea es un síntoma común y se ha planteado el uso de opioides para su control. Objetivo: Revisión sistemática de la literatura sobre el uso de opioides en el manejo de la disnea en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca crónica estable con clase funcional NYHA II, III o IV. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de los artículos encontrados en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, OVID, LILACS, PROSPERO a partir del 1 de enero del 1995 hasta el 31 de julio del 2018, publicados en cinco idiomas. Se incluyeron aquellos estudios en los cuales se describe la administración de cualquier tipo de opioide para el manejo de la disnea en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca crónica estable, NYHA II, III o IV. Resultados: Se incluyeron cuatro ensayos clínicos para el análisis final, con un numero total de 70 pacientes, en los cuales se describe la administración de opioides para el manejo de la disnea en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca crónica estable, NYHA II, III, o IV. Conclusiones: En pacientes adultos con insuficiencia cardiaca crónica compensada en tratamiento óptimo, existe evidencia de baja calidad que muestra beneficio para el manejo de la disnea con opioides, deben realizarse estudios aleatorizados controlados con una cantidad de individuos mayor para poder generar una recomendación más fuerte.


Subject(s)
Humans , Quality of Life , Heart Failure , Analgesics, Opioid , Review Literature as Topic , MEDLINE , Alkalies , LILACS
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL